The Effects of Secondary Oxides on Copper‐Based Catalysts for Green Methanol Synthesis

Catalysts for methanol synthesis from CO2 and H2 have been produced by two main methods: co‐precipitation and supercritical anti‐solvent (SAS) precipitation. These two methods are compared, along with the behaviour of copper supported on Zn, Mg, Mn, and Ce oxides. Although the SAS method produces initially active material with high Cu specific surface area, they appear to be unstable during reaction losing significant amounts of surface area and hence activity. The CuZn catalysts prepared by co‐precipitation, however, showed much greater thermal and reactive stability than the other materials. There appeared to be the usual near‐linear dependence of activity upon Cu specific area, though the initial performance relationship was different from that post‐reaction, after some loss of surface area. The formation of the malachite precursor, as reported before, is important for good activity and stability, whereas if copper oxides are formed during the synthesis and ageing process, then a detrimental effect on these properties is seen.

Authors: Dr. James S. Hayward Dr. Paul J. Smith Dr. Simon A. Kondrat Prof. Michael Bowker Prof. Graham J. Hutchings

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201601692

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement
No 637016.

USO DE COOKIES

Cookies are important for the proper functioning of this site. To improve this experience, we use third-party analytic cookies in order to allow us to elaborate statistical information about the user’s activities in this site as well as first party customization cookies to record the user’s acceptance of the use of cookies on this site. By continuing to browse our site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.OK
For more information on cookies please refer to our privacy and cookie policy.

Top